|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 62-66
Nature walk decrease the depression by instigating positive mood
Atul Kumar Goyal1, Arun Bansal2, Jyoti Saini3
1 Department of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery (ENT), PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
2 Natural Biodiversity Association, Chandigarh, India
3 Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Guwahati, Assam, India
|Date of Web Publication||29-Oct-2018|
Atul Kumar Goyal
Department of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery (ENT), PGIMER, Chandigarh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: Depression the most common psychological problem prevails across the world. To deal with depression, psychotropic drugs are generally prescribed by the clinicians which have enormous side-effects. Nature walk refers to a walk in the natural area containing wild flora and fauna, undisturbed by the anthropogenic means. The nature walk is considered as a live meditation which imparts mental peace in the walkers. But limited evidence is availed till date reporting the role of a nature walk in instigating positive mood. Therefore, present work was carried out to evaluate the potential role of a nature walk in decreasing depression by instigating the positive mood. Methods: For this, a nature walk was organized for 20 participants in Chhatbir Zoo, Chandigarh. The mood of participants was assessed by using the BMIS instrument. Results: Results of the present study revealed that nature walks significantly instigate the positive mood. Conclusion: Based on our results, we suggest that nature walk can be used as an intervention to manage depression.
Keywords: Depression, happy, mood, nature walk, wildlife
|How to cite this article:|
Goyal AK, Bansal A, Saini J. Nature walk decrease the depression by instigating positive mood. Soc Health Behav 2018;1:62-6
| Introduction|| |
Depression is defined as the state of permanent mood of being sad or unhappy for a long duration of time. It is one of the most prevalent mental problems among all age groups across the world and may exist as a self-limiting illness to a chronic, lifelong illness. The global prevalence of depression is 10%–15%, which is similar to what occurs in India (15.9%) among the general population. If primary health-care centers were taken into account, depression was reported to occur in 21%–84% of the cases in India. A study conducted at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research in 2017 indicated that 40% of adolescents had depressive disorders in Chandigarh. To treat depression, clinicians prescribe several types of medical interventions including antidepressant medications and mood stabilizers such as lithium. All these psychotropic drugs impart enormous side effects on the general health. Moreover, the stigma associated with the mental problems worsens the quality of life (QoL) of psychiatric patients. A study conducted by Lin et al. showed that self-stigma is a dominant factor which could reduce the QoL of people with schizophrenia, and patients' self-esteem can improve patients' QoL. A recent study has revealed that natural ways such as mediation can enhance the self-esteem of the psychiatric patients and can help in self-stigma reduction.
Nature walk refers to a walk in the natural area containing wild flora and fauna, undisturbed by the anthropogenic means. The nature walk is considered as a live meditation which imparts mental peace in the walkers. Natural environments contain the stimuli which restore brain from mental fatigue and initiate innate emotional, physiological, cognitive, and behavioral responses, which restore the positive state of mind. The level of biodiversity of the natural environment was also reported to contribute to the degree of positivity. More natural habitats (e.g., mountains, forests, woodlands, and valleys) have been found to be associated with greater positivity compared to less natural settings (e.g., parks, gardens, and farmland fields). Positivity was also found to be positively correlated with the number of plant and animal species and habitat.
Studies have revealed that interacting with nature can enhance the cognition in individuals with depression.,, Furthermore, it has been reported that the longer we connected to the nature, the lesser chance will be there for depression. Therefore, to generate an evidence-based approach, we performed the present study. Under this study, we organize a nature walk in the Chhatbir Zoo, Chandigarh, for twenty participants and the current mood was assessed using the Brief Mood Introspection Scale (BMIS).
| Methods|| |
Study type and location
The present study was a single-centric, blinded, single–group, and single-time point study. The study was conducted at the Chhatbir Zoo (30.6039° N, 76.7925° E), Chandigarh, India [Figure 1]. The study was carried out in July 2018 in the morning time (IST 10:00 AM).
|Figure 1: Geographical map of Chhatbir Zoo (30.6039° N, 76.7925° E), Chandigarh, India|
Click here to view
Participants and study procedure
Twenty healthy participants, with no history of psychiatric disorders, belonging to different educational and cultural backgrounds, were included in the study. Participants having age >18 years of either sex were included in the study. Participants were recruited based on an online open invitation to participate in the study which was promoted through social media on the first-come, first-served basis. The BMIS questionnaire was provided to the participants and asked to fill after 2 h of zoo visit. To eliminate researcher-oriented biases, we made participants to fill out the questionnaire by themselves. Further to ensure blinding, we informed the participants that questionnaire is just a survey about the zoo.
Brief mood introspection scale
We used the BMIS to study the mood of the participants at the current time point. The BMIS was developed by Mayer and Gaschke in 1988 and is one of the most commonly used scales of mood in psychological studies. The BMIS requires participants to rate their current state of mind according to 16 mood adjectives on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from (1) Definitely do not feel (xx) to (2) Do not feel (x) to (3) Slightly feel (v) to (4) Definitely feel (vv). The BMIS scale has been proven to have good reliability (Cronbach's α −0.76–0.83).,,
The response in BMIS scale can be analyzed in four domains including pleasant–unpleasant, arousal–calm, positive–tired, and negative–relaxed. Positive items in each domain were scored directly (xx = 1, x = 2, v = 3, and vv = 4), whereas two methods are available for scoring of negative items in BMIS, i.e., reverse scoring and subtractive scoring. In our study, we used the reverse scoring in which each item was reverse scored (xx = 4, x = 3, v = 2, and vv = 1). The final score is obtained by the sum of the direct score and reverse score.,,
For the pleasant–unpleasant scale, positive items (i.e., content, loving, peppy, happy, caring, lively, calm, and active) were directly summed and negative items (i.e., jittery, sad, fed up, grouchy, tired, drowsy, gloomy, and nervous) were reverse scored. Possible scores range from 64 (extremely pleasant) to 16 (extremely unpleasant). For the arousal–calm scale, high arousal adjectives (i.e., active, caring, fed up, gloomy, jittery, lively, loving, nervous, peppy, sad) were directly summed and low arousal adjectives (i.e., calm, tired) were reverse scored. Possible scores for this scale range from 48 (extremely aroused) to 12 (extremely calm). For the positive–tired scale, positive adjectives (i.e., active, caring, lively, loving, and peppy) were directly summed and tired adjectives (i.e., drowsy and tired) were reverse scored. Possible scores for this scale range from 28 (extremely positive) to 7 (extremely tired). For the negative–relaxed scale, negative adjectives (i.e., fed up, gloomy, jittery, nervous, and sad) were directly summed and relaxed adjectives (i.e., calm) were reverse scored. Possible scores for this scale range from 24 (extremely negative) to 6 (extremely relaxed).,,
The statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism software version 7.04. The mean and standard deviation of the obtained score from the BMIS scale were calculated. Paired t-test was used to compare the means and P < 0.005 was considered statistically significant. The final score was also analyzed using the Bland–Altman plot. The arousal–calm score was taken at the average and pleasant–unpleasant score was taken at the difference. Similarly, negative–relaxed was taken at the average and positive–tired score was taken at the difference.
| Results|| |
All the participants in the study had postgraduate level education. Among the total 20 participants, 13 were males and 7 were females, with a mean age of 36 years. All participants were from urban background. The mean score for the pleasant–unpleasant domain was 53.29 ± 1.25 which is significantly high (P ≤ 0.001) when compared to the mean score for arousal–calm domain which was 29.0 ± 0.44 [Table 1] and [Figure 2]. Similarly, the score for positive–tired was 22.53 ± 0.63 which is also significantly higher (P ≤ 0.001) than negative–relaxed score which was 10.18 ± 0.38 [Table 1] and [Figure 3]. In Bland–Altman plot, the horizontal axis shows the arousal–calm score and green dots show the mean difference of pleasant–unpleasant score to arousal–calm score [Figure 4]. In another plot, the horizontal axis shows the negative–relaxed score and green dots show the mean difference of positive–tired score and negative–relaxed score [Figure 5].
|Table 1: The mean score with standard deviation for four subdomains of Brief Mood Introspection Scale|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Mean Brief Mood Introspection Scale score for the pleasant–unpleasant domain and arousal–calm domain (***P > 0.001)|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Mean Brief Mood Introspection Scale score for the positive–tired domain and negative–relaxed domain (***P > 0.001)|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Bland–Altman plot showing the mean difference of pleasant–unpleasant score to arousal–calm score|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: Bland–Altman plot showing the mean difference of positive–tired score to negative–relaxed score|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
There is growing evidence to suggest that exposure to natural environments can be associated with mental health benefits. The amount of green space in residential areas has been associated with greater happiness and life satisfaction. Studies have revealed that nature walks in urban, public green space downturn the depression by enhancing the stress-ameliorating, restorative experiences and positive mental well-being. In our study, the pleasant score was significantly high compared to the arousal score, which indicates that nature walk inducts a pleasant mood. The positive score in our study was also significantly high compared to the negative score, indicating that nature walk induces a positive state of mind. The results of our study are in consistent with the previous study conducted by Korpela et al., in which they found that nature walks significantly decrease the depression and potentially increase the positive mental well-being. Feelings of anger, depression, tension, and confusion were found to be significantly reduced after nature walk.
Results of the present study were also supported by the fact that individuals who move to the greener urban area have a significantly good mental health compared to individuals who live in an area where natural flora and fauna is lacked. A study conducted by Bratman et al. reported that in healthy participants, nature walk could decrease the rumination and neural activity in the subgenual prefrontal cortex. Another study suggested that people who do nature walk have lower rates of depression and blood pressure-related problems. It has also been estimated that nature walk of 30 min during a week could reduce the prevalence of depression and blood pressure up to 7% and 9%, respectively.
Although the present article determines the role of a nature walk in prompting positive mood induction, being a pilot study, it has several limitations. Our study lacks the prenature walk assessment which could give more substantial amount of evidence to support the present study results. Another limitation is, being a pilot study, the sample size is very small which could reduce the validity of results on the general population.
| Conclusion|| |
The present study concluded that nature walk has a significant role in instigating positive mood and possibly can be used as an intervention to manage depression in the general population as well as at clinical level. Being a pilot study, the current work has several limitations, but still our study represents the initial evidence to intervene in nature walk into depression management. A more detailed study with pre-post assessment taking control group into consideration and large sample sizes over a long duration of follow-up could be of paramount importance.
The authors highly acknowledge Chhatbir Zoo authorities for permitting to conduct the study. The authors also acknowledge the Natural Biodiversity Association, Chandigarh, for providing necessary support to conduct the study. The authors are also thankful to all the colleagues who reviewed the present work.
Financial support and sponsorship
The present work is supported by the Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) provided by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, vide file no. 3/13/JRF -2015/HRD. Transport was provided by the Natural Biodiversity Association, Chandigarh, India. Entry fee of participants was sponsored by the Chhatbir Zoo authorities.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Richards D. Prevalence and clinical course of depression: A review. Clin Psychol Rev 2011;31:1117-25.
Pattanayak RD, Sagar R. Depressive disorders in Indian context: A review and clinical update for physicians. J Assoc Physicians India 2014;62:827-32.
Singh MM, Gupta M, Grover S. Prevalence & factors associated with depression among schoolgoing adolescents in Chandigarh, North India. Indian J Med Res 2017;146:205-15.
] [Full text]
Hollon SD, Thase ME, Markowitz JC. Treatment and prevention of depression. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2002;3:39-77.
Mago R. Adverse effects of psychotropic medications: A call to action. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2016;39:361-73.
Corrigan PW, Watson AC. Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry 2002;1:16-20.
Lin CY, Chang CC, Wu TH, Wang JD. Dynamic changes of self-stigma, quality of life, somatic complaints, and depression among people with schizophrenia: A pilot study applying kernel smoothers. Stigma Health 2016;1:29.
Huang WY, Chen SP, Pakpour AH, Lin CY. The mediation role of self-esteem for self-stigma on quality of life for people with schizophrenia: A retrospectively longitudinal study. J Pac Rim Psychol 2018;12:1-7.
Marselle MR, Irvine KN, Warber SL. Walking for well-being: Are group walks in certain types of natural environments better for well-being than group walks in urban environments? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013;10:5603-28.
Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 2007;3:390-4.
Hinds J, Sparks P. The affective quality of human-natural environment relationships. Evol Psychol 2011;9:451-69.
Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AM, Davies ZG, Rouquette JR, Maltby LL, et al
. and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 2012;62:47-55.
Berman MG, Kross E, Krpan KM, Askren MK, Burson A, Deldin PJ, et al.
Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. J Affect Disord 2012;140:300-5.
Cox DT, Shanahan DF, Hudson HL, Plummer KE, Siriwardena GM, Fuller RA, et al
. Doses of neighborhood nature: The benefits for mental health of living with nature. Bioscience 2017;67:147-55.
Tillmann S, Tobin D, Avison W, Gilliland J. Mental health benefits of interactions with nature in children and teenagers: A systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2018;72:958-66.
Shanahan DF, Bush R, Gaston KJ, Lin BB, Dean J, Barber E, et al.
Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Sci Rep 2016;6:28551.
Mayer JD, Gaschke YN. The experience and meta-experience of mood. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988;55:102-11.
Preeshl A, George G, Hicks W. The path to presence in performance through movement, physiological response, and mood. Cogent Educ 2015;2:1047607.
Biss RK, Hasher L, Thomas RC. Positive mood is associated with the implicit use of distraction. Motiv Emot 2010;34:73-7.
Pearson DG, Craig T. The great outdoors? Exploring the mental health benefits of natural environments. Front Psychol 2014;5:1178.
Korpela KM, Stengård E, Jussila P. Nature walks as a part of therapeutic intervention for depression. Ecopsychology 2016;8:8-15.
Barton J, Hine R, Pretty J. The health benefits of walking in greenspaces of high natural and heritage value. J Integr Environ Sci 2009;6:261-78.
Bratman GN, Hamilton JP, Hahn KS, Daily GC, Gross JJ. Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:8567-72.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]